False equivalence mars automotive policy

Pakistan’s draft Automotive and Auto Parts Manufacturing Policy 2026–31 gets the destination broadly right: electrifying transport, reducing the country’s petroleum import bill, conserving foreign exchange and building an export-oriented automotive industry are all worthwhile objectives. The proposed shift towards exports, higher domestic value addition, greater competition, technology adoption and New Energy Vehicles (NEVs) represents an important structural change for Pakistan’s automotive sector. But the policy’s approach to different electric-vehicle technologies needs greater precision. The core weakness is treating Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs), Range Extended Electric Vehicles (REEVs) and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) as interchangeable for incentive purposes. The current proposal provides all three with the same one percent sales tax treatment, along with exemptions from FED, CVT and withholding tax, despite significant differences in their propulsion architecture, electric-driving capability and potential petroleum displacement. The solution, however, should not be to restrict the strongest incentives exclusively to BEVs. Pakistan’s policy should recognize BEVs and genuine REEVs as electric-propulsion technologies, while treating PHEVs as a separate transitional category. A BEV is propelled entirely by electric power. A properly defined REEV is also driven exclusively by an electric traction motor, with its internal-combustion engine functioning only as an onboard generator to produce electricity and not mechanically driving the wheels. REEVs can therefore provide the benefits of electric propulsion while addressing one of Pakistan’s biggest barriers to early BEV adoption: limited charging infrastructure and range anxiety. PHEVs are different. Their internal-combustion engine can also participate directly in propulsion. They should therefore not automatically receive the same level of incentive as BEVs and genuine REEVs. Instead, PHEV incentives should be linked to measurable performance, including electric-only range, battery capacity, fuel consumption, emissions and demonstrated petroleum displacement. This would create a more rational incentive structure without prematurely excluding technologies that can accelerate Pakistan’s transition towards electrification. The objective should be to reward the degree of genuine electrification and petroleum displacement, rather than simply the presence of a battery or a plug. The charging-infrastructure challenge also deserves greater attention. The draft proposes reducing import duty on charging stations to one percent and considering viability-gap funding for battery-swapping infrastructure. These are positive measures, but they should form part of a broader national charging strategy covering highways, cities, commercial fleets, residential locations and fast-charging corridors. Without adequate charging infrastructure, consumer adoption of pure electric vehicles will remain constrained. The policy’s financing proposal is another welcome step. Increasing the NEV financing limit from Rs3 million to Rs10 million and extending the financing tenor from three to five years could materially improve affordability and accelerate consumer adoption. Such financing support should remain focused on genuine NEV technologies and could similarly be differentiated according to the degree of electrification and environmental performance. The wider policy framework has considerable merit. Mandatory export obligations would move Pakistan’s automotive industry away from an almost exclusively domestic-market orientation. For cars, jeeps and SUVs, exports are proposed to rise to 12 percent of factory-gate production value by 2029–30, with similar requirements thereafter. Across OEMs and auto-parts manufacturers, the policy targets approximately US$4. 59 billion of cumulative exports during 2026–31. The proposed export-linked support mechanism is also encouraging. Eligible OEMs and parts manufacturers could receive 10 percent of net FOB export value, with an additional 5 percent where export value increases by at least 5 percent year-on-year. Linking such support to realized export proceeds and third-party audits is an important safeguard. However, export incentives should increasingly reward incremental exports, higher domestic value addition and genuine integration into global supply chains, rather than simply the volume of exported products. This is essential if Pakistan is to move from an assembly-based automotive industry to a competitive manufacturing and export platform. The proposed Minimum Domestic Value Addition (MDVA) framework is therefore an important development. Conventional cars are targeted to reach 40 percent MDVA by 2030–31, while the proposed NEV requirement rises from 10 percent initially to 15 percent. The NEV industry may reasonably require greater flexibility during its initial development phase, but localization should increasingly move beyond final assembly towards batteries, battery-management systems, electric motors, power electronics, wiring systems, thermal-management systems and other strategic components. The proposed tariff rationalization is another major structural reform. The policy envisages substantial tariff reductions, eventual elimination of Regulatory Duty and Additional Customs Duty, and the phasing out of SRO-based concessions in favour of more transparent, rules-based mechanisms. If implemented consistently, this could significantly increase competition and force manufacturers to improve productivity, pricing, technology and product quality. The fiscal implications, however, underline the need for better targeting of NEV incentives. The policy estimates additional FED collections of approximately Rs349. 9 billion against DLTL expenditure and NEV-related tax concessions, resulting in a projected cumulative fiscal surplus of around Rs21. 1 billion. More importantly, the annual fiscal position is projected to move from a Rs46. 8 billion surplus in 2026–27 to a Rs44. 1 billion deficit by 2030–31. This makes it even more important that limited fiscal resources are directed towards technologies that deliver measurable electrification, fuel savings and emissions benefits. Pakistan therefore needs a technology-neutral but performance-based NEV policy. BEVs and genuine REEVs should receive strong support as electric-propulsion technologies, while PHEVs should qualify for incentives according to measurable electric-driving capability, fuel displacement and emissions performance. Conventional non-plug-in hybrids should remain separately classified. The policy should also provide a clear technical definition of REEV to ensure consistent treatment by the Engineering Development Board, FBR, Pakistan Customs and other regulatory authorities. Classification should be based on the vehicle’s actual propulsion architecture rather than merely the presence of an internal-combustion engine. The proposed Auto Parts Export Council, stronger vehicle standards, adoption of UNECE standards and the creation of testing infrastructure are also steps in the right direction. These measures can help Pakistan’s component manufacturers integrate into international supply chains and support the broader objective of making the country an export-oriented automotive manufacturing base. Pakistan’s automotive policy should therefore not be about choosing one technology prematurely. It should be about choosing the right direction and rewarding measurable progress towards electrification. BEVs represent the ultimate zero-tailpipe-emission pathway. Genuine REEVs can provide electric propulsion while addressing current infrastructure and range limitations. PHEVs can serve as a transitional technology, but their incentives should reflect their actual contribution to electrification and petroleum displacement. If the government combines this differentiated NEV framework with export obligations, stronger localization, transparent tariffs, charging infrastructure, technology development and performance-based incentives, the Automotive and Auto Parts Manufacturing Policy 2026–31 could become more than an industrial policy. It could become the foundation for Pakistan’s transition from a protected domestic assembly market to a competitive, technology-driven and export-oriented automotive industry.

Read full story on Business Recorder