A war the world sees and a crisis it ignores

As the world’s strategic gaze fixes on the unfolding Iran war, a far more certain and slow-moving catastrophe is advancing quietly toward the countries, which are most venerable to climate change. It carries no missiles, commands no headlines, and attracts no emergency diplomacy—yet it threatens more lives than many conventional conflicts combined. Pakistan, at an arm’s length from the consequences of Iran war, is at the epicenter of a looming climate catastrophe. Climate change, long acknowledged but persistently deprioritized, is now poised to become one of the deadliest forces confronting Pakistan. Recent research emerging from the ‘University of Chicago’s Climate Impact Lab’ underscores the gravity of this threat. Projections indicate that rising temperatures alone could result in tens of thousands of additional deaths annually in Pakistan in the coming decades, with estimates reaching well over 100, 000 lives at risk if current trajectories persist. These are not speculative fears but data-driven forecasts built on extensive global mortality records and climate modelling. The tragedy is not merely the scale of the impending loss, but the context in which it unfolds. At a time when the global order is being reshaped by geopolitical rivalries, wars, and shifting alliances, climate vulnerability in countries like Pakistan has been relegated to the periphery. The emerging world order is increasingly transactional, security-driven, and short-term in its priorities. In such an environment, slow-burn crises—however lethal—fail to command sustained attention. Pakistan stands at the epicenter of this neglect. It is among the countries most exposed to extreme heat, erratic monsoons, and flooding, yet possesses limited adaptive capacity. Scientific evidence shows that in poorer and hotter countries, rising temperatures are not just an environmental concern but a direct public health emergency. Heat stress, dehydration, cardiovascular strain, and the spread of vector-borne diseases form a lethal chain reaction, particularly for vulnerable populations. The numbers are sobering. Studies suggest that by mid-century, climate-induced heat could become a leading cause of mortality in parts of South Asia. In Pakistan, the projected death rate from rising temperatures is expected to outpace many infectious diseases combined. This is compounded by structural deficiencies—limited healthcare access, low air-conditioning penetration, and widespread informal labour that forces millions to work in extreme heat conditions. Yet climate mortality is not confined to heat alone. Floods, which have become increasingly intense, bring a second wave of silent casualties. Research shows that rainfall and flooding can account for a significant proportion of deaths during monsoon seasons, not only through immediate disasters but through secondary effects such as waterborne diseases and infrastructure collapse. In Pakistan, where drainage, sanitation, and urban planning lag behind rapid population growth, these risks are magnified. Equally alarming is the invisibility of many of these deaths. Reports indicate that a large proportion of climate-related fatalities—especially among children and the elderly—go unrecorded, masking the true scale of the crisis. This statistical invisibility translates into policy neglect. What is not counted is rarely prioritized. The global dimension of this neglect is equally stark. Climate change is inherently unequal in its impact. While wealthier nations invest in adaptive infrastructure—cooling systems, resilient urban design, early warning mechanisms—poorer countries bear the brunt of the damage. The University of Chicago’s study itself highlights a critical insight: mortality from climate hazards is shaped as much by preparedness and governance as by the hazards themselves. This raises an uncomfortable question: is the world witnessing not just a climate crisis, but a crisis of global priorities? The answer appears to be in the affirmative. The reconfiguration of global power is increasingly centred on military strength, economic blocs, and strategic competition. Climate cooperation, once a central theme of international engagement, is slipping down the agenda. Even climate finance commitments remain inadequate and inconsistently delivered, leaving vulnerable countries like Pakistan to confront an existential challenge with limited resources. This neglect is not merely an oversight—it is a structural failure of the evolving world order. Wars trigger immediate mobilization because they threaten state sovereignty and geopolitical balance. Climate change, by contrast, erodes human security gradually, disproportionately affecting those with the least voice in global decision-making. For Pakistan, the implications are profound. The country is not just facing a climate challenge; it is confronting a compound crisis where environmental stress intersects with economic fragility and governance constraints. Without urgent investment in adaptation—urban cooling, water management, healthcare resilience, and disaster preparedness—the projected death toll may well become a grim reality. However, the narrative need not be entirely fatalistic. Evidence from other regions shows that targeted interventions—early warning systems, infrastructure development, and improved emergency response—can significantly reduce mortality even in the face of intensifying climate hazards. The difference lies in political will and prioritization. The world today is preoccupied with visible conflicts, but history will judge it by how it responded to the invisible ones. The Iran war may dominate headlines, but the climate crisis will define the century. For Pakistan, the warning is already clear, the data unequivocal, and the timeline unforgiving. The question is not whether this crisis will unfold—but whether it will continue to be ignored until it is too late. Copyright Business Recorder, 2026

Read full story on Business Recorder