The shifting sands of Asia

THERE is a specific kind of quiet that settles over a capital city when its ruling elite begins to realise that the ground beneath their feet is moving. In Canberra and Melbourne, among the scholars and officials who manage the delicate machinery of the Australian state’s foreign policy, that quiet is palpable. There is the hushed intensity of a room where the old maps no longer match the terrain. I am currently here meeting those tasked with studying and navigating these waters, and the sense one gets is unmistakable: Asia is undergoing a crucial transition. For decades, the regional order was built on two sturdy pillars: American security protection and American economic dynamism. Today, both pillars are trembling. The region is waking up to a world where it can no longer outsource its security to Washington or rely solely on the American consumer to drive its growth. Instead, it is being forced to find its own security architecture and cultivate its own sources of economic dynamism. The realisation is not unique to this part of the world. Last year, a similar trip to Europe yielded almost identical observations. In Brussels, the conversation was dominated by the ‘Great Retreat’ — the fear that the Atlantic alliance is fraying and that Europe must finally learn to speak the language of power on its own. Now, standing on the other side of the globe, the echoes are hauntingly familiar. Whether in the North Atlantic or the Indo-Pacific, the era of the ‘unconditional umbrella’ is drawing to a close. The catalyst for this upheaval, of course, is a burgeoning China. Beijing’s shadow now looms over every conversation here, presenting Asia with a stark and unprecedented set of challenges and opportunities. For many, China is the indispensable economic partner; for almost all, it is the primary strategic concern. All countries in the region — from the middle powers like Australia to the emerging giants of Southeast Asia — are struggling to find an arrangement that allows them to both confront the risks of Chinese assertiveness and capture the rewards of its economic engine. Scholars and officials are intensely curious about Pakistan’s role in the current global firestorm. In this shifting landscape, older arrangements like the Quad — comprising the US, Japan, India, and Australia — remain steadfast anchors. They represent the ‘old guard’ of the rules-based order, providing a sense of continuity and a collective front. Yet, even as these anchors hold, we are seeing the emergence of nimbler groupings. These ‘minilaterals’ and ad hoc security pacts suggest that the new challenges coming up in the world are rendering the traditional, broad-based arrangements outmoded. Interestingly, amidst these high-level strategic debates, a recurring theme has emerged in almost every meeting I have attended. Scholars and officials here are intensely curious about Pakistan’s role in the current global firestorm. Specifically, everyone asks about Pakistan’s ongoing diplomacy regarding the war on Iran. The fact that Islamabad has positioned itself as an indefatigable mediator — hosting the ‘ Islamabad Talks ’ and securing critical ceasefire extensions from the Trump administration — has caught the world by surprise. This has resulted in Pakistan commanding huge, almost academic curiosity. There is a palpable desire among the policymaking community to understand what they can learn from our specific experience. In a world where most nations feel forced to choose a side, Pakistan’s ability to rem­a­­in ‘ all-weather friends ’ with Beijing while also be­­coming a key diplomatic interlocutor for a mercurial Trump administration is seen as a masterclass in high-wire balancing. They are looking to our history of navigating great power competition to see if there is a template for their own survival. Two questions, in particular, keep popping up with remarkable frequency. The first is: how did Pakistan deal with the Trump administration to gain so much closeness with them? There is a fascinated bewilderment at how a relationship once defined by transactional friction has evolved into one where the White House accepts Pakistani mediation on the most sensitive of global security issues. They want to know the ‘secret sauce’ — whether it is an alignment of personal styles, a newfound strategic utility, or simply the cold logic of regional geography that has made Islamabad an indispensable partner for Washington’s current Middle East policy. The second question is equally pointed: how did Pakistan acquire such closeness with China? In an era where ‘de-risking’ and ‘de-coupling’ are the buzzwords, the China-Pakistan strategic alliance is viewed with both envy and apprehension. Scholars here are dissecting the ‘ CPEC effect’ and the Action Plan for 2025-2029, trying to understand how a nation can maintain such a deep, multi-generational bond with a rising superpower while simultaneously navigating the West’s demands. They see in Pakistan a case study of a country that appears to have, for better or worse, made the transition towards finding its own ‘sources of economic dynamism’ by hitching its wagon to the Chinese engine. The fascination stems from a realisation that the ‘Pakistan Model’, long dismissed as an anomaly, might actually be the precursor for the future of middle-power diplomacy. The officials I’ve been speaking to are eager to deconstruct our successes and failures, hoping to extract lessons on how to maintain agency when caught between the grinding gears of two superpowers. They want to know how we managed to turn geographical proximity into diplomatic leverage, and whether our recent successes in the Iran conflict can be replicated in other regional flashpoints. The security architecture of the future looks less like a single, grand alliance and more like a complex, overlapping web of interests. It is a world where security is bespoke, not off the rack. As the American tide recedes, Asia’s nations are discovering they must not only learn to swim on their own but also shape the very pool in which they operate. The transition is fraught with risk, but it is also an admission of reality. The old world is gone; the new one is being built right here, in the corridors of power in cities like Canberra. As we navigate this transition, the questions being asked about Pakistan suggest a deep interest: to learn from, to study, to mind the pitfalls, and to regard with curiosity — or perhaps as a warning for others trying to survive the same storm. The writer is a business and economy journalist. khurram. husain@gmail. com X: @khurramhusain Published in Dawn, April 30th, 2026

Read full story on Dawn